Democrats claim Roe ineligible to run; GOP blasts effort as deceptive

Pin It

Candidates’ Linked In profile cited as source for questioning residency

By Mike McGann, Editor, The Times

EricRoe

Eric Roe

The House Democratic Campaign Committee (HDCC) alleged Thursday that Eric Roe, a Republican endorsed write-in candidate for the 158th State House seat, is not eligible to run — saying he hasn’t met the residency requirements, while local GOP officials blasted Democrats for trying to “confuse” local voters.

According to the HDCC, Roe’s Linked In page calls into question whether or not he has lived in the 158th district or Pennsylvania long enough to be eligible to run for State Representative. Under the state Constitution, State Representatives must live in the state for four years and within the district for one year prior to the election. Democrats contend that Roe spent time living and working in Washington D.C. after his 2010 graduation from American University. They also cite Roe’s time living in London, while studying at University College.

Roe is waging a write-in campaign for State Representative for the GOP nomination, along with Perry Bentley. Democrat Susan Rzucidlo is also seeking the GOP nod, via a write-in campaign. County Republicans were forced to resort to a write-in campaign after Lenny Rivera withdrew from the race, after questions emerged about the validity of his nominating petitions. Less than two years ago, Cuyler Walker abruptly withdrew from the state house race, ultimately replaced by incumbent Chris Ross, who had planned on retiring. Ross went on to defeat Rzucidlo in the 2014 general election.

Local Democrats say that once again, Republicans are showing a lack of respect for the rule of law and the residents of the 158th District by endorsing and running an ineligible candidate.

“These documents show that Eric Roe does not meet the residency requirements to run for office in Pennsylvania,” Said Brian McGinnis, Chair of the Chester County Democratic Committee. “First, Cuyler Walker, then Lenny Rivera, and now Eric Roe — all are unfit for office. I wonder what else is next for the Republicans.”

Local Republicans blasted the claims as false and deceptive — little more than an election season trick to fool voters.

“This is a pathetic attempt by the Democrat Party to confuse voters just days before a Primary Election in hopes that their Democrat candidate wins the Republican Primary.” said Chester County Republican Committee Chair Val DiGiorgio in a statement issued Friday morning.

“Let’s set the record straight,” DiGiorgio continued. “Eric Roe has been a resident of Pennsylvania and the 158th State House District for 25 years.  He’s been registered to vote here since he was 18 years old. He has continually maintained his driver’s license and car registration here and he has filed his income taxes here. This is all public record and indisputable.” 

But it seems Democrats aren’t buying the argument, and may seek legal intervention in the courts.

“It appears that Eric Roe has only been a resident of Pennsylvania for two years

and three months preceding the 2016 Election and not the required four years,” said

Nathan Davidson, Executive Director of the PA HDCC. “We will continue to investigate

and are seriously considering challenging his candidacy in court if he were to win the

nomination. In 2014 it was Cuyler Walker, and in 2016 it was Lenny Rivera; voters of

the 158th District do not need a third bait-and-switch from the Chester County

Republican Committee under questionable circumstances. Eric, if your LinkedIn page

has misrepresented your residency let the voters know, otherwise please have the

decency to withdraw from the write-in campaign and prevent further legal action.”

But Republicans say it is the Democrats who are playing games and working to deceive and confuse voters.

“Susan Rzucidlo, the Democrat candidate, has spent the last two months trying to mislead Republicans, hoping they will vote for her in the Republican Primary,” DiGiorgio said. “Now, she is propagating blatant lies and should be ashamed of herself.  She is a three-time loser, and in her fourth attempt for this office, she knows her only hope for election is underhanded tricks and political games.

“On Tuesday, Republican voters can be confident that Eric Roe is the real, conservative Republican candidate endorsed by their neighbors, the local Republican Committee people.”

Share this post:

6 Comments

  1. Marice Bezdek says:

    Val DiGiorgio is lowering himself and his Republican party with his insults. Add to that the third Republican candidate with troubling ethics, and the nominally Democrat but basically non-partisan Susan Rzucidlo looks to be by far the better choice.

  2. Russ says:

    This seems like a very simple case where Mr. Roe either lied on his Linked In resume or he is lying now. The Donald Trump-style name-calling and insults by the Republicans should only make the public more suspicious. If Mr. Roe lied in either case, then he is not fit to hold public office, just like the last few candidates put forward by the Republican party. The next question should be, “is this the best that the Republicans can do?”

  3. Wayne says:

    If Eric Roe has been living here all along, why did he feel the need to embellish his current LinkedIn resume to imply that he was a DC insider? I find that very troubling. Haven’t we had enough of politicians who play fast-and-loose with the truth?

  4. Sally Braffman says:

    I love that the chair of the RCCC has resorted to name-calling! I’ve been talking with Republicans on behalf of Susan Rzucidlo and for the most part they are receptive and respectful. Only one has called her names and happily I didn’t have to talk with him!

  5. Lisa says:

    Is it this hard to find a qualified, experienced Republican candidate? Every election they go through several. I guess if your leader is as unprofessional as expressed here, well, you get what you get.

  6. Garrett McDaniel says:

    It seems that this should be pretty clear cut: Either Mr. Roe meets the legal requirements for residency or he doesn’t. Neither the Democratic statements nor the Republican rebuttals have quoted chapter and verse regarding what constitutes the requirements for claiming residency. Will someone consult with the Secretary of State and get this clarified, please?